Featured Article THB UndercoverFreedom from Crooked Pharmaceutical Companies
Three Cheers for the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine! They are one of the first mainstream publications to blow the whistle on greedy pharmaceutical executives who drive up sales by pushing doctors to prescribe dangerous drugs for off-label (non-approved) use. The corruption of these white collar drug pushers is so out of control that the journal authors stated, “drastic action is essential to preserve the integrity of medical science and practice and to justify public trust.” 1
This very revealing statement underscores a sad fact that has been apparent to many of us for some time — the whole medical profession is on the brink of a meltdown thanks to the greed and unethical marketing practices of Big Pharma.
The motivating factor in this latest drug company scandal involves the Parke-Davis/Pfizer drug Neurontin, which was introduced in 1993 to a relatively narrow market —individuals affected with a specific seizure condition called partial complex seizures. Two years after its introduction, Neurontin’s 1995 sales were a respectable $98 million. By 2004 however, that number jumped to an astounding $3 billion.2 As you might guess, this tremendous spike in sales was not related to an increase in people suffering from seizures.
Instead, it was due to an overly aggressive Parke-Davis marketing campaign in which doctors were continuously pushed and often misled to prescribe Neurontin for off-label uses like pain management for migraines, epilepsy control, and even bipolar disorder. While manipulative marketing practices may not be illegal, pushing pharmaceutical drugs for non-approved use is. And this is where the medical profession’s hands are dirty too.
Parke-Davis recruited physicians and paid them handsomely to act as salesmen/spokespersons, consultants, researchers, and educators — all to promote and dramatically increase sales for the off-label use of Neurontin. Their researchers even developed clinical trials which enabled neurologists to use the drug on their patients for various disorders at twice the approved FDA dosing limit of 1800 mg per day.
One would have to surmise that the physicians on the Parke-Davis payroll were either ignorant of the law or found it more lucrative to simply ignore — either way, it’s nothing to be proud of.
The story of Neurontin, as shocking as it is, is far from unusual. Pushing drugs for non-approved use is common practice in the pharmaceutical world. And it might have been successfully swept under the rug if it were not for one lone voice of honesty. David Franklin, a Parke-Davis pharmaceutical rep was strong-armed by a company executive to promote Neurontin for off-label use, who told him in part, “…I don’t want to see a single patient coming off Neurontin before they’ve been up to at least 4800 mg/day. I don’t want to hear that safety crap either, have you tried Neurontin, every one of you should take one just to see there is nothing, it’s a great drug.”3
Soon after, Mr. Franklin left Parke-Davis and filed a suit against them (and their parent company Pfizer) claiming that the off-label marketing of Neurontin amounted to “false claims” intended to elicit money from the federal government. To avoid criminal charges and civil liabilities, the company agreed in 2004 to pay fines of $430 million, a small fraction of its illegal $3 billion windfall. A class action suit filed by parties who purchased the illegally marketed Neurontin (and possibly suffered severe side effects) has not yet been settled.
It would be naïve to think that the Neurontin case was the turning point in cleaning up the unethical business practices of the pharmaceutical industry, especially when our own government oversight is so often corrupt and incompetent. But it might be a start. The fact that one of the country’s leading medical journals has now acknowledged the role their profession plays in greed-driven pharmaceutical marketing should be a wake-up call to every doctor who is writing out prescriptions while investing heavily in Big Pharma or working for them on the side.
What this means for the rest of us is pretty simple — stay as healthy as you can for as long as you can. And don’t look to Big Pharma to have a panacea for all that ails you, especially if a natural approach will solve your problem. As Dr. Mark Wiley said in an excellent THB article:
Everyone needs to get a physical every year, including blood and urine tests. If a problem is found, they should seek alternative, non-toxic, non-invasive methods to balance the body. After a period of time, they should have more tests run to see if the problem is better or worse. If better, continue with alternative medicine. If worse, and in the red zone of health, then turn to mainstream medicine for help. Not the other way around!
Following this simple common sense advice could be our most effective strategy for breaking the stranglehold that Big Pharma has on our lives and our health.
References
- Landefeld CS, Steinman MA. The Neurontin Legacy — Marketing through Misinformation and Manipulation. NEJM, 8 January 2009; 360: 103-6.
- http://www.pyrabang.com/view.php?ref=retsey&post_id=10201&visitor=true
- http://www.essentialdrugs.org/edrug/archive/200901/msg00023.php
For more great articles like this delivered to your inbox, subscribe to our free natural health newsletter!
Tags: big pharma, neurontin, prescription drugs
Rate this article by clicking on the stars below.

(12 votes, average: 4.67 out of 5)
Finally, someone tells it like it is - the pharmaceutical companies are all about money and not health.
Entered: March 11th, 2009 at 7:47 am. PermalinkAs I was reading this article, I got more and more excited. I have epilepsy and over the course of 20 years have spent thousands of dollars on medication. Last year, generic drugs became almost a must. The pharmacy that I used for 10 years recently increased the price substantially on the medication that I have always taken. Kind of like punishing me if I didn’t do what I was told. Buying generic was more than just a suggestion. Thankfully, I have pharmaceutical insurance and can afford the increase. I also have a wonderful Dr. who preferred that I don’t take generic because you can’t trust that the quantity of medicine will be the same in every pill.
Thank you to an honest Dr. who cares more about his patients than money and Mr. Franklin, who would rather lose his job than have people become ill.
Being told what to do should be illegal.
Entered: March 11th, 2009 at 9:29 am. PermalinkI guess you’ve never known anybody who benefited from a drug for an unlisted condition while waiting the years it takes the FDA to approve new uses? Much better to suffer than to want the latest and best treatment.
Entered: March 11th, 2009 at 10:15 am. PermalinkYou are way off base on this one. My wife developed idiopathic peripherial neuropathy suddenly at age 53. She was curled up in a fetal position on the couch with pain. Neurontin, prescribed by her neurologist, has enabled her to return to work, and given her hope and a life. HOW DARE YOU try to take my wife back to near death existence. He knew what was best for the patient. STAY OUT! While I have good insurance at the moment, I would get these drugs for her regardless of the cost, regardless of the risk. I really don’t care if they make money on them. It’s life! We read the labels. We know the side effects. And we accept the risk, because the alternative is unacceptable. Arrogant you… interfering with her doctor - client relationship.
Lots of drug treatments are discovered by off-label uses. I understand some of the Erectile Disfunction drugs were discovered the same way.
Entered: March 11th, 2009 at 10:44 am. PermalinkAs a physician, I’ve seen the serious side effects of this drugs being used for everything but siezures! It has been often prescribed for pain, but I have never seen it be of any benefit. It is about time this drug is being exposed.
Entered: March 11th, 2009 at 12:37 pm. PermalinkA great and timely report,thanks a million.Tell me if it’s possible to send this report to a loved one.
Entered: March 12th, 2009 at 11:53 am. Permalinkmy teeth are rotting and /or breaking off.
Entered: March 12th, 2009 at 5:44 pm. PermalinkHello! I really find your information worthy of reading. I am planning to use your researches to the pamphlet that I am planning to write. But I am afraid of being sued later. Please tell me what to do to avoid any problem in the future.
Entered: March 14th, 2009 at 9:50 am. PermalinkThank you so much.
I took this 4 months ago and this has helped me shoot the basketball better.
Entered: March 16th, 2009 at 3:21 pm. PermalinkI am all for the use of drugs if they help on or off label. However covering up the suicides and not being responsible enough to put warnings on its label so that we can make an informed decisions is just plain wrong . My husband killed himself after being on the drug neurontin for only 6 months. Had something been on the label I may have seen the signs. It wasn’t until after he was gone that things fell into place. Just please watch your loved ones for any strange behavior and call there drs right away.
Entered: March 18th, 2009 at 9:03 pm. PermalinkThis article highlights the risk we all take when taking the marketing spin of a product without considering the motivation of the proponent. There is no money for drug companies in preventing illness, only in treating it after it has become serious or, we have been convinced by advertising that we have a problem. Thats not to say that we shouldn’t look for additional benefits from existing treatments, but it shouldn’t be done as a drug company marketing excercize.
We all need to remember that preventing illness is preferable to curing it. So much of our health problems and the cost of treating them, is preventable.
Entered: April 22nd, 2009 at 7:17 pm. PermalinkThere has to be a change in mindset. Most people think they have been cheated if their doctor does not give them a prescription when they visit the office. Then there is the attitude that a pill cures and the pill is all I need. That is why so many people are on mutiple medications. All of us have to get back to treatment guidelines that in many instances encourage non-pharmacological treatments first.
Entered: July 14th, 2009 at 5:57 am. Permalink